Criterios Clínicos para el Manejo de las Complicaciones del Tejido Blando Periimplantar
Palabras clave:
mucosa queratinizada, implantes dentales, defectos mucogingivales, tejido blando periimplantar, injertosResumen
Las complicaciones del tejido blando periimplantar condicionan la apariencia estética y el pronóstico clínico de los implantes y son, en la actualidad, cada vez más diagnosticadas. Los defectos gingivales asociados a implantes dentales incluyen recesiones, fenestraciones o dehiscencias en la superficie mucosa vestibular, inflamación gingival, ausencia de encía insertada/queratinizada, falta de volumen y presencia de concavidades gingivales que generan sombras y oscuridad en la mucosa. La detección de éstas en forma temprana permite establecer un plan de tratamiento en busca de soluciones eficaces. Mediante la presentación de una serie de casos, abordaremos distintos procedimientos para aumento de los tejidos blandos periimplantarios y la corrección de defectos. La ganancia de encía queratinizada ha demostrado tener un impacto positivo en la estabilidad a largo plazo de todos los tejidos implantarios.
Citas
Adibrad M, Shahabuei M y Sahabi M. (2009). Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on the health status of the supporting tissue around implants supporting overdentures. J Oral Implantol, 35(5), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAIDJOI-D-09-00035.1
Anderson LE, Inglehart MR, El-Kholy K, Eber R y Wang HL. (2014). Implant associated soft tissue defects in the anterior maxilla: a randomized control trial comparing subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent, 23(4), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000122
Bassetti RG, Stähli A, Bassetti MA y Sculean A. (2016). Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig, 20(7), 1369–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1815-2
Bassetti RG, Stähli A, Bassetti MA y Sculean A. (2017). Soft tissue augmentation around osseointegrated and uncovered dental implants: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig, 21(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-2007-9
Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F y Nouneh I. (2008). Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23(2), 323–326.
Boynueğri D, Nemli SK y Kasko YA. (2013). Significance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res, 24(8), 928–933. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02475.x
Caplanis N, Romanos G, Rosen P, Bickert G, Sharma A y Lozada J. (2014). Teeth versus implants: mucogingival considerations and management of soft tissue complications. J Calif Dent Assoc, 42(12), 841–858.
Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE y Wang HL. (2006). Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol, 77(8), 1410–1420. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050393
Hürzeler MB y Weng D. (1996). Periimplant tissue management: optimal timing for an aesthetic result. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 8(9), 857–869.
Hutton CG, Johnson GK, Barwacz CA, Allareddy V y Avila-Ortiz G. (2018). Comparison of two different surgical approaches to increase peri-implant mucosal thickness: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol, 89(7), 807–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0597
Karring T, Lang NP y Löe H. (1975). The role of gingival connective tissue in determining epithelial differentiation. J Periodontal Res, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1975.tb00001.x
Levine RA, Huynh-Ba G y Cochran DL. (2014). Soft tissue augmentation procedures for mucogingival defects in esthetic sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29(Suppl), 155–185. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.2
Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O y Rattanamongkolgul S. (2010). Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 21(6), 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01887.x
Papi P y Pompa G. (2018). The use of a novel porcine derived acellular dermal matrix (Mucoderm) in periimplant soft tissue augmentation: preliminary results of a prospective pilot cohort study. Biomed Res Int, 6406051. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6406051
Puzio M, Błaszczyszyn A, Hadzik J y Dominiak M. (2018). Ultrasound assessment of soft tissue augmentation around implants in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft and xenogeneic collagen matrix 1-year randomised follow-up. Ann Anat, 217, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.11.003
Schmitt CM, Tudor C, Kiener K, Wehrhan F, Schmitt J, Eitner S, Agaimy A y Schlegel KA. (2013). Vestibuloplasty: porcine collagen matrix versus free gingival graft: a clinical and histologic study. J Periodontol, 84(7), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120084
Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, Wehrhan F, Neukam FW y Schlegel KA. (2016). Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res, 27(11), e125–e133. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12575
Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, Fiorellini J y Weber HP. (2009). Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res, 20(10), 1170–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01795.x
Sorni-Bröker M, Peñarrocha-Diago M y PeñarrochaDiago M. (2009). Factors that influence the position of the peri-implant soft tissues: a review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 14(9), e475–e479. http://www.medicinaoral.com/pubmed/medoralv14_i9_pe475.pdf
Strub JR, Gaberthüel TW y Grunder U. (1991). The role of attached gingiva in the health of peri-implant tissue in dogs. 1. Clinical findings. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 11(4), 317–333.
Zarb GA y Schmitt A. (1990). The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent, 64(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-e
Zucchelli G, Mazzotti C, Mounssif I, Mele M, Stefanini M y Montebugnoli L. (2013). A novel surgical-prosthetic approach for soft tissue dehiscence coverage around single implant. Clin Oral Implants Res, 24(9), 957–962. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12003
Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Stefanini M, Barootchi S, Mazzotti C, Gori G y Wang HL. (2019). Classification of facial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone. J Periodontol, 90(10), 1116–1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0616
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
